top of page

Child Psychiatrist /Adult Psychiatrist

Writer's pictureVilash Reddy, MD

Vision Loss a New Dementia Risk Factor? What Do the Data Say?

In 2019, 57 million people worldwide were living with dementia, a figure expected to soar to 153 million by 2050. A recent Lancet Commission report suggests that nearly half of dementia cases could be prevented or delayed by addressing 14 modifiable risk factors, including impaired vision.


dementia

The report's authors recommend that vision-loss screening and treatment be universally available. But are these recommendations warranted? What is the evidence? What is the potential mechanism? And what are the potential implications for clinical practice?


Worldwide, the prevalence of avoidable vision loss and blindness in adults aged 50 years or older is estimated to hover around 13%.


"There is now overwhelming evidence that vision impairment in later life is associated with more rapid cognitive decline and an increased risk of dementia," Joshua Ehrlich, MD, MPH, associate professor in ophthalmology and visual sciences, the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, told Medscape Medical News.


The evidence includes a meta-analysis of 14 prospective cohort studies with roughly 6.2 million older adults who were cognitively intact at baseline. Over the course of up to 14 years, 171,888 developed dementia. Vision loss was associated with a pooled relative risk (RR) for dementia of 1.47.


A separate meta-analysis also identified an increased risk for dementia (RR, 1.38) with visual loss. When broken down into different eye conditions, an increased dementia risk was associated with cataracts and diabetic retinopathy but not with glaucoma or age-related macular degeneration.


A US study that followed roughly 3000 older adults with cataracts and normal cognition at baseline for more than 20 years found that those who had cataract extraction had significantly reduced risk for dementia compared with those who did not have cataract extraction (hazard ratio, 0.71), after controlling for age, race, APOE genotype, education, smoking, and an extensive list of comorbidities.


Causation or Coincidence?


The mechanisms behind these associations might be related to underlying illness, such as diabetes, which is a risk factor for dementia; vision loss itself, as might be suggested by a possible effect of cataract surgery; or shared neuropathologic processes in the retina and the brain.


A longitudinal study from Korea that included roughly 6 million adults showed that dementia risk increased with severity of visual loss, which supports the hypothesis that vision loss in itself might be causal or that there is a dose-response effect to a shared causal factor.


Ehrlich told Medscape Medical News, "work is still needed to sort out" exactly how visual deficits may raise dementia risk, although several hypotheses exist.


For example, "decreased input to the brain via the visual pathways may directly induce brain changes. Also, consequences of vision loss, like social isolation, physical inactivity, and depression, are themselves risk factors for dementia and may explain the pathways through which vision impairment increases risk," he said.


Is the link causal? "We'll never know definitively because we can't randomize people to not get cataract surgery versus getting cataract surgery, because we know that improving vision improves quality of life, so we'd never want to do that. But the new evidence that's come in over the last 5 years or so is pretty promising," Esme Fuller-Thomson, PhD, director of the Institute for Life Course and Aging and professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine and Faculty of Nursing, at the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, told Medscape Medical News.


She noted that results of two studies that have looked at this "seem to indicate that those who have cataract surgery are not nearly as high risk of dementia of those who have cataracts but don't have the surgery. That's leaning towards causality."


A study published last month suggests that cataracts increase dementia risk through vascular and non–Alzheimer's disease mechanisms.


Clear Clinical Implications


Ehrlich told Medscape Medical News evidence for an association between untreated vision loss and dementia risk and potential modification by treatment has clear implications for care.


"Loss of vision impacts so many aspects of people's lives beyond just how they see the world and losing vision in later life is not a normal part of aging. Thus, when older adults experience vision loss, this should be a cause for concern and prompt an immediate referral to an eye care professional," he noted.


Fuller-Thomson agrees.


"Addressing vision loss will certainly help people see better and function at a higher level and improve quality of life, and it seems probable that it might decrease dementia risk so it's a win-win," she said.


In her own research, Fuller-Thomson has found that the combination of hearing loss and vision loss is linked to an eightfold increased risk for cognitive impairment.


"The idea is that vision and/or hearing loss makes it harder for you to be physically active, to be socially engaged, to be mentally stimulated. They are equally important in terms of social isolation, which could lead to loneliness, and we know that loneliness is not good for dementia," she said.


"With dual sensory impairment, you don't have as much information coming in — your brain is not engaged as much — and having an engaged brain, doing hobbies, having intellectually stimulating conversation, all of those are factors are associated with lowering risk of dementia," Fuller-Thomson said.


The latest Lancet Commission report noted that treatment for visual loss is "effective and cost-effective" for an estimated 90% of people. However, across the world, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, visual loss often goes untreated.


"A clear opportunity for dementia prevention exists with treatment of visual loss," the report concluded.


Ehrlich and Fuller-Thomson have no relevant conflicts of interest.


Note: This article originally appeared on Medscape.

0 views0 comments

Comentários


bottom of page